Monday, September 15, 2008

The End of an Era

It seems to me that the past six months have been building up to one weekend, this past one, for the Breast Cancer 3-Day.

Not being able to walk was such a disappointment on many levels. I felt that I was letting down my team, the people (many of whom I've never met) who sponsored me, myself. I started off and walked further than I had anticipated, making it to the first checkpoint about 2.4 miles in, then part of the way from the second to the third checkpoint before hailing one of the many "sweep vans" they had patrolling for folks who couldn't continue the Walk.

Thinking on it, I somehow feel empty. Maybe it's because I didn't actually walk, but the experience wasn't exactly how I'd thought it would be. There were moments, little glimmers, of the effect I'd expected.

Seeing a cancer survivor welling up in tears as she carried a flag in front of all 3,000 or so walkers brought a lump to my throat. Women whose heads were shaven...on purpose or due to chemo...were also visible in the crowds. I wished that those feelings of compassion and empathy stayed with me for the whole weekend. I wanted to be a part of something bigger than myself, to really understand that the things that upset me don't amount to a hill of beans...or something like that. People in this world have suffered; I've only been inconvenienced.

In the end, the feeling I've come away with is that it wasn't all about breast cancer or survival, although those are parts of it. The feeling was more...commercialized. In the past month, I've received dozens of emails from an official vendor offering to sell me Breast Cancer 3-Day items that I can re-sell at a mark up to raise money...there were kiosks selling the gear at the Walk itself...the ceremonies, while celebratory, reminded me of Princess House rallies I'd attended years ago. The message is, sell more to make more. Sell more stuff to raise more money for research. Buy our stuff. Sell our stuff. Consume. Spend.

I don't know if they're using these sales techniques because they work or if they use them to pitch the idea of cancer research as a commodity without regard to how they may appear. My friends, family, myself and complete strangers donated $2,200 toward my walk, of which only 70% actually goes to research. The rest is overhead. And by any charity's standards, that's way too much in overhead.

Seattle-area walkers raised $8.6 million. You know I can't do math, but it seems to me that 30% of 8.6 million is a goodly sum. That's just from one city. They organize Walks in something like 11 cities per year.

I am glad that I participated; training for the Walk gave me a sense of purpose and a common goal with other people. But would I do this again? Probably not. The whole thing has given me a sort of "Charlie Brown" reaction. It's too commercialized.

The emotions were there, but they were evoked through marketing and technique. Showmanship. The only real emotions I experienced were seeing people who had been directly affected by cancer and knowing that they have every reason to seek a cure.

Labels:

6 Comments:

Blogger Ninja Doll typed...

You made it to the walk and you walked. Maybe not the whole route, but you walked. That's more than was done by most of your neighbors, co-workers, and acquaintances.

You put aside that pesky foot problem and went maybe 3 miles, 5 miles, to show your support. You joined cancer sufferers and survivors and made a visible statement that you are committed to their lives...that you want them to grow old with you, that your compassion far exceeds your own physical boundaries and their disease is your disease, too.

You rallied us to support you for being the heroine for the cause on our behalf, because we weren't walking. We spoke with our money because you asked with your heart.

The commercialism will always be there because 70% of $1.00 is still more than nothing. The overhead will always be there: consultants, accountants, therapy, wigs, prosthetics, lobbying, printing, office space, liability insurance, legal fees, and all the other necessities of a life support organization are heftier than yours. Remember that woman carrying the flag? The overhead went to help her carry the thing. It coordinated so much for her, including child care, meals, housekeeping, if she needed them. They referred her to support groups, doctors, etc. They helped her negotiate through a sea of volunteers and legal obligations (maybe even her last will and testament) and gave her family the one thing so hard to find in a sea of human beings - a shoulder to lean on.

The disease is massive. It needs massive amounts of money. All the grants, all the donations, all the crumpled dollar bills in jars, can only do so much if not effectively tracked, budgeted, spent.

So yes, it's gotten very commercial to raise money. When faced with losing your life to a disease over which you have no control, anything that isn't going directly to the tumor can look and feel like an utter waste of time. It can become disenchanting. It takes the joy out of giving because they never stop wanting you to give. Soon it's like bleeding.

And every sufferer and survivor you saw is grateful that they draw one more breath, take one more step, because 70% of every dollar helped buy them another day on earth. They are also grateful that they are still alive because of the organization that searches for miracles for only 30% of the till.

Snap out of it. You did a good thing. Sure, it wasn't a good thing the way you envisioned it, but it was a good thing that the woman with the flag and all her sisters (and brothers!) could never have dreamed you'd do for them. You are their hero. And you are my hero, too.

<3

September 16, 2008 9:32 AM  
Blogger Owl Chick typed...

I know charities have overhead, but 30% is much too high for a fundraising organization. They're just passing along the funds raised, so the overhead should be smaller imho.

Services were provided by an "all-volunteer" force, as we were reminded during the closing ceremonies. Volunteers had to pay to volunteer in order to cover their own overhead.

Meals were donated/sponsored/paid for by participants (I had to pay $90 for my overhead as a walker). The tents are durable goods that are trucked to each event and depreciate over time. Sponsors cover other expenses along the way, too, such as rest stops and water stations.

I'd rather have seen a ratio of less than 30%. Maybe 20%. In any case, it's something to think about and as I didn't actually walk, I've had lots of time to think about it. :)

September 16, 2008 11:05 AM  
Blogger Issigri typed...

What your sister said. :)

http://charityreports.bbb.org/public/Report.aspx?CharityID=3432&bureauID=9999

In 2006 they had 78% toward programs (171 million of 242) so as a charity percentage wise they aren't too bad. It shows what they pay in salaries and the number of paid positions so you can figure the average. The ceo in 2006 made almost $300,000. Could they do better? Probably, Unicef came in at 91% toward programs.

It's commercial because whether they are competing for your Christmas dollar or charity dollar they are still competing. The important thing is you sucker...err, got people to donate to a good cause that wouldn't have otherwise donated and did so without hawking the trinkets.

September 16, 2008 9:49 PM  
Blogger Ninja Doll typed...

It's all proportionate. A charity that raises $500mil a year generally has a lower overhead % than a charity that raises half that. And the CEO of a local nonprof makes far less per year than the CEO of a national organization.

Find another charity if this one doesn't make you happy, or forget doing the big-ticket events and just volunteer/donate where it impacts you most.

I just don't want to hear you're unhappy with your efforts on behalf of those who really, really need you. No one else is unhappy, dammit =D

September 17, 2008 8:10 AM  
Blogger Ninja Doll typed...

Is it just me or has the typeface on your blog gotten really, really tiny?

September 23, 2008 12:00 AM  
Blogger Owl Chick typed...

It's just you; I haven't changed a thing. And haven't posted anything in a week, either.

Maybe First Chair is messing with your view settings ;)

September 23, 2008 10:42 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home